| (Instrumental) - Boom chr Paige |
|
Follow me here - I'm off on a tangent: This suggests the interoperability between the "age of saturation" in both common language and scientific format, i.e. the correlation between the "days of overuse, abuse, and over-fulfillment" vs. the time required for a chemical saturation, or the scientific / literal point of excess. Obviously, the human mind exists in the physical world, regardless of perception, the "soul" and "deeper meaning" we have to recognize that there is a "true" binary reaction in our heads being, actually, a handful of chemical/electrical impulses in our CNS's. ((i.e. No logical, but philosophical stretch - if you die, the brain cannot continue to function, which (in turn) fails to produce thought of any nature - being accepted as synapse.) Further: no synapse = no human thought, therefore = not a thinking human = dead.) So, accepting that saturation exists chemically, is it possible that the human mind is reaching a level of excess that is bordering on true clinical / chemical saturation (I slash the words to blur the distinction, if you agree with paragraph 2) thanks to the accessibility of "dire" information in the age? I know as people age, they fear the changes happening around them, which causes a reactionary response to kick against the present as being "wrong" or "broken", but I've been studying (softly) the generational differences, primarily because I sensed that a whole generation of drug abuse and alcoholism (the infamous 60s) has irreparably altered the following generations - never mind that two other very "important" inventions were to be announced, i.e. media news & ARCANET (kinda scary, when you look at how FOX and CNN abuse the internet like a cheap pro). Thoughts? -=- Boom chr Paige 11/29/08 |